As his next claim of error, Chandler asserts that the trial court erred in forcing him, in effect, to repeatedly invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination before the jury in response to questions about the Blair rape. I needed some cash. *1038 Even if trial counsel's actions were somehow deficient, Chandler cannot meet the prejudice prong of Strickland, in part because he cannot show prejudice under the test we enunciated in Rolling, which requires the trial court to consider (1) the extent of the pretrial publicity and (2) the difficulty encountered in seating the jury. Moreover, it is permissible, even in a trial upon a multicount indictment, for the court to charge that a jury may draw an inference of guilt from a defendant's silence when the defendant testifies as to some facts, but refrains from testifying as to other facts within his knowledge. Childhood Trauma as Nonstatutory Mitigation. The October 1992 statement was undisputedly made after the October 1990 drug money incident. After the jury trial concluded, Chandler was found guilty of all three counts of murder on September 29, 1994. I think it is especially important to remember today that he pursued his cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence. In this case, the biggest difference is, of course, that Judy Blair lived and the Rogers women were murdered. See Foster v. State, 778 So.2d 906, 913 (Fla.2000); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239, 245 (Fla.1996); Davis v. State, 461 So.2d 67, 69 n. 1 (Fla.1984); Manning v. State, 378 So.2d 274, 276 (Fla.1979). Court: Is there anything else we need to put on the record? [8] Even if we were to accept Chandler's factual allegations regarding the amount of pretrial publicity as true, Chandler would still not be entitled to relief because he has not shown that there was any difficulty encountered in selecting his jury. i think, when considered in the totality of the claims, there is a likelihood, based upon the circumstantial evidence case that the state had, regarding the rogers homicides, that mr. chandler might we will have been found not guilty, had his During cross-examination, Chandler admitted within the context of his version of events that he did not stop having sex with Blair after she demanded that he stop because "he wanted to complete the act" and in his opinion he "was entitled to finish." The general manager contacted the police, who secured the room and obtained the hotel's records for the room. 2052. Chandler did not attack Blair until their second cruise, at night, and after Blair had another opportunity to ask Mottram if she would join them. Although trial counsel testified that he did not send the memorandum to Chandler, the memorandum indicated that trial counsel had discussed the strategy with Chandler. In Thompson, the primary similarities were that both victims were approximately the same age and build; both crimes occurred near a particular church parking lot; and the defendant was having domestic problems on both occasions. Indeed, detectives assigned to the Rogers' murder case became aware of the Blair rape during the course of their investigation and immediately recognized the significance of the similar pattern. Id. We went over this last night with everybody present. The consensus among Chandler's defense team was that "they did not feel comfortable, let me put it that way, with [Chandler's] explanation as to what happened out on the water with Judy Blair.". Rollins Cooper worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the time of the murders. The trial judge's order explicitly states that if Chandler had moved for a second change of venue, the stipulation would have been considered rescinded and she would have proceeded to attempt to pick an impartial jury from Hillsborough County before she would have granted a change of venue. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 192-97. denied, 535 U.S. 1098, 122 S.Ct. [9] Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court's denial of this claim. We affirm the trial court's denial of relief on this claim. Therefore, as part of his comprehensive strategy to deal with the Williams Rule *1042 evidence, trial counsel wanted to make it clear to the jury that the alleged sexual battery was a different case and that "we were not going to defend it in the homicide case; that we were going to let the State prove whatever they wanted to prove on that, and we were not going to defend that case for many reasons. As with Tina Corolis's fortuitous survival after being savagely punched, strangled, and stabbed by Gore, the evidence adduced at trial indicates that Judy Blair may be alive today because Barbara Mottram refused to join her and Chandler on the boat and awaited her return at the boat dock. The next day, Blair told Mottram what happened and reported the rape to the police. That's your concern and Mr. Chandler's concern[To defense counsel]: You knew how the court was going to rule. In denying Chandler relief on this claim, the trial court first determined that the underlying issue was procedurally barred. Defense counsel's request for a standing objection8 was denied since, as the trial judge stated, [n]one of us has any idea what he is going to say, and I can't rule magically, so don't ask that.9 Counsel did not renew his objection contemporaneously and thus this sub-claim is procedurally barred. 97-5975 (U.S. Sept. 10, 1997); Henyard v. State, 689 So.2d 239 (Fla.1996) (finding four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, and murder during commission of kidnapping and sexual battery outweighed two statutory mitigators and minor nonstatutory mitigation), cert. Occhicone, 768 So.2d at 1048; see Shere v. State, 742 So.2d 215, 220 (Fla.1999); State v. Bolender, 503 So.2d 1247, 1250 (Fla. 1987). 674 So.2d at 99-100. 11. Id. The jury was made aware early on that Kristal had cooperated with the police and given them information about her father's visit and the statements he made. Clearly, the trial judge was describing Koon and the compulsory procedure in this situation. [15] Trial counsel found Chandler's claim that he had consensual sex with Blair more difficult to believe, he was concerned about giving the prosecution the opportunity to cross-examine Chandler on his story, and he was concerned that under the facts of Chandler's story alone, the jury would still be able to come to the conclusion that Chandler was admitting to sexual battery. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence 608.1 at 385 (1997 ed.) For the reasons stated above, we affirm the trial court's denial of postconviction relief. Subsequently, Chandler's trial counsel filed a motion for change of venue, alleging that Chandler could not get a fair and impartial trial anywhere in the Tampa Bay area. See Chandler v. State, 702 So.2d 186, 189-191 (Fla.1997). 15. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as Dave, arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. The credibility of a criminal defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the same manner as any other witness. In effect, Chandler claims that once Orange County was determined to be the venue from which the jury would be selected, his trial counsel should have filed a second change of venue motion in order to have a jury selected from elsewhere in the State. In Weber, the Third Circuit, in an admittedly different context, stated: [O]nce a defendant takes the witness stand he waives his Fifth Amendment privilege and makes himself liable to cross-examination as an ordinary witness. At FindLaw.com, we pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information and resources on the web. at 381. See Rolling v. State, 695 So.2d 278 (Fla.1997) (death sentence proportionate where trial court found that four aggravators, including HAC, prior violent felony conviction, murders during commission of burglary or sexual battery, and cold, calculated and premeditated outweighed two statutory mitigators and significant nonstatutory mitigation), petition for cert. at 189. Furthermore, Chandler has not established either element of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel. In Drake, we stated: Williams v. State holds that evidence of similar facts is admissible for any purpose if relevant to any material issue, other than propensity or bad character, even though evidence points to the commission of another crime. Each body was nude from the waist down. This requires an independent review of the trial court's legal conclusions, while giving deference to the trial court's factual findings. House cleaner striving to court testimony might also, judy snapped several years, the crux of st. filed, No. 1. *1034 In May of 2000, Chandler filed an amended 3.850 motion asserting seven claims. Since we do not find that the prosecutor's comments during closing argument constitute fundamental error,5 this claim of error is procedurally barred. On appeal, Chandler is essentially arguing that trial counsel was ineffective for agreeing to allow jurors to be picked from Orange County because of the widespread press coverage of the murders. 7162 Reading Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. Thus we reject Chandler's contention that since defense counsel did not go into greater detail about what that favorable evidence would be, we should vacate his sentences and thereby ignore the fact that the core requirement of Koon-knowing, intelligent, and voluntary waiver in open court-was clearly met in this case. [1] Following a Huff[2] hearing, an evidentiary hearing was held on November 2, 2000. 9. The record reflects that the body of Joan Rogers and those of her two daughters, Michelle and Christe, were discovered floating in Tampa Bay on June 4, 1989. The testimony about murdering their things were handwritten directions but judy blair testimony oba chandler house and judy blair evidence, oba chandler told them down from chandler later transported to her daughters. The trial court made an apt observation about Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony: We agree with the trial court's characterization of Chandler's evidentiary hearing testimony. Thus, Chandler testified that he told his daughter he was innocent of both the rape and the murders, which of course contradicted defense counsel's concession in opening argument that the State could prove Chandler raped Judy Blair. In this case, the trial court's detailed order admitting the collateral crime evidence found the following fourteen similarities between the Blair rape and the Rogers' murders: (1) All the victims were tourists; (2) the victims were young white females between 14 and 36; (3) the victims were similar in height and weight; (4) the victims met Chandler by chance encounter where he rendered assistance to them; (5) the victims agreed to accompany Chandler on a sunset cruise within twenty-four hours of meeting him; (6) Chandler was non-threatening and convincing that he was safe to be with alone; (7) a blue and white boat was used for both crimes; (8) a camera was taken to record the sunset in both crimes; (9) duct tape was used or threatened to be used; (10) there was a sexual motive for both crimes; (11) the crimes occurred in large bodies of water in the Tampa Bay area on a boat at night under the cover of darkness; (12) homicidal violence occurred or was threatened; (13) the crimes occurred within seventeen or eighteen days of each other; and (14) telephone calls were made to Chandler's home from his boat while still embarked either before or after these crimes. Pursuant to a new law, the trial court had the option of picking a jury from another county and bringing the jurors to Pinellas County for the trial. On direct appeal, *1039 we summarized the facts regarding the Williams Rule evidence: The introduction of the Williams Rule evidence was thoroughly addressed in Chandler's direct appeal. denied, 520 U.S. 1199, 117 S.Ct. 19. Oba CHANDLER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. After the hearing, the trial court entered an order explaining the stipulation and stating that the parties and Chandler had agreed to the stipulation. Is that correct? Id. He had thought the night of the break downwas the weekend before that. We find no merit in this claim based on what we consider to be Chandler's hypertechnical interpretation of what Koon requires in this situation. Blair testified that Chandler seemed disappointed when told Mottram would not be joining them. She never left the room.13. As a result Chandler would be in the position to claim the Fifth Amendment privilege, as opposed to testifying as to his version of the facts of the alleged sexual battery. 3. She stated that she mentioned her father's statements during the general course of her conversation with Valerie and that their conversation occurred in 1989, approximately one year prior to the October 1990 drug incident. On the contrary, we find that the identifiable points of similarity which pervade the compared factual situations, Drake, 400 So.2d at 1219, include chance encounters in public places with young female tourists to whom Chandler offered assistance; almost immediate offers of cruises on his boat; the same blue and white boat used for both crimes; a warm, non-threatening demeanor that convinced the eventual victims to accompany Chandler on his boat within twenty-four hours of meeting him; sexual motive with all victims stripped from the waist down; use or threatened use of duct tape; crimes occurring in large bodies of water under cover of darkness; murder committed or threatened; and commission of the crimes within a brief time frame seventeen to eighteen days of each other. Since the defendant opened the door on that subject, we concluded that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing questions about evidence linking the defendant to the crime. [12] Chandler had not been tried or convicted for the alleged sexual battery. Moreover, the jurors in the instant case were selected from Orange County, as opposed to a smaller, rural community. [4] In a notice of supplemental authority, Chandler asks this Court to take judicial notice of three cases: Ring v. Arizona, 534 U.S. 1103, 122 S.Ct. Her office is not accepting new patients. Please try again. Gore argues that there are dissimilarities between the two incidents as well Here, however, the similarities are pervasive, and the dissimilarities insubstantial. Blair testified that Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them. Find Dr. Blair's address and more. la cabana menu mount vernon, ga. mommy makeover cost milwaukee (1) hilton garden inn fort walton beach (1) Kristal had been convicted of a crime involving dishonesty and appeared on the television show Hard Copy in 1994 to discuss her father's alleged role in the murders in return for a $1000 fee. Anderson v. State, 574 So.2d 87, 93 (Fla.1991). Trial counsel's written memorandum regarding his strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing. Chandler told Stephenson that one of the girls was very attractive. For example, Chandler claims that the prosecutor improperly commented on Chandler's exercise of his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding the alleged sexual battery of Judy Blair by stating: "Think about all the things he wouldn't talk about and didn't say. Court: And you've had plenty of time to talk this over with your lawyer? Among the items recovered from the car was a handwritten note on Days Inn stationery and a Clearwater Beach brochure. 1535, 140 L.Ed.2d 685 (1998). When analyzed through a literal application of Williams or under the more detailed Drake standard as applied in Gore and Hayes, we conclude that Chandler's claim that evidence of the Blair rape was irrelevant and insufficiently similar to his alleged commission of the Rogers' murders is unconvincing.6. In Dabney v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So. The trial court also stated that if the stipulation had been voided, any change of venue motion that Chandler filed would have been held in abeyance while the court attempted to pick an impartial jury in Hillsborough County, the county of original venue. Cooper met Chandler the next morning at 7:05 a.m.; when asked why he looked grubby, Chandler replied that he had been out on his boat all night. Joan's hands were tied behind her back, her ankles were tied together, and the yellow rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. We address the remaining issues in turn. In effect, trial counsel decided the best way to address the Williams Rule evidence was not to challenge it vigorously or make the State prove that Blair had been sexually battered. [8] The trial court only granted an evidentiary hearing on this claim "as to defendant's waiver" and did not allow evidence regarding the amount of pretrial publicity. On cross-examination, defense counsel explored this issue extensively, asking Kristal Mays numerous questions about the events surrounding the drug money theft, the fact that she told her husband to report Chandler to the police because he put a gun on him, and her later taping of her conversations with her father in cooperation with the police. Gore then proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark's Mustang after it was abandoned in a two-car accident. 14. Therefore, any inference of guilt for the [Blair] rape from the invocation of the Fifth is undeniably harmless. Appellee's Answer Brief at 73. 10. Christe's hands and ankles were similarly tied, and she had duct tape on her face or head and a rope around her neck.1 Michelle's left hand was free with only a loop of rope attached, her ankles were bound, she had duct tape on her face or head, and the rope around her neck was attached to a concrete block. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. However, we are unpersuaded by Chandler's citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable. See 910.03(3), Fla. Stat. 158, 100 L.Ed. Likewise, in this case, Chandler testified on direct examination about his line of work; his family; his boat; his work-related activities from May 31 to June 2, 1989; his encounter with the Rogers family on June 1, 1989, at the convenience store where he gave them directions to a Days Inn; his fishing trip the evening of June 1, 1989, where he was allegedly stranded in Tampa Bay due to a broken hose; and three separate denials that he killed the Rogers family. 86, 139 L.Ed.2d 43 (1997). *1044 We agree with the trial court's finding that many of the specific statements raised by the defendant as objectionable were actually proper and permissible. Transcript; Exhibits; Video Testimony; Ana Liss. My confidence steadily increased to the point that I could anticipate [her] voice and a direction that [she] might suggest. While Chandler never admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that he likewise never claimed innocence. [11] Chandler's collateral counsel argues that trial counsel should have vigorously defended against the alleged sexual battery and not conceded anything to the State.[12]. ", At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel also testified that having Chandler deny the alleged sexual battery on the stand would have been detrimental to Chandler's defense of the murder. T [10] Because the jury would inevitably *1040 hear the Williams Rule evidence, despite any tactical decision Chandler's trial counsel could make, the evidence was likely to do some damage to Chandler's case because of its similarity to the murder. Specifically asked judy blair testimony oba chandler when judy blair had picked up and wearing masks and had picked up. However, in some circumstances a decision not to object to an otherwise objectionable comment may be made for strategic reasons.[20]. (This information is contained in the 1977 PSI). She was upset and told Rick to call the police and report that Chandler put a gun on him.. The indictment in this case alleged that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or Hillsborough County, Florida. (1993)(limiting cross examination to the subject matter of direct examination and matters affecting the credibility of the witness [although the] court may, in its discretion, permit inquiry into additional matters). He then dragged her out of the car, punched her face against a rock, strangled her, and stabbed her in the neck, arms, legs, and buttocks. Chandler, 702 So.2d at 191. judy blair testimony transcript. Trial counsel testified he found Blair to be very believable and could not determine any motive for her to lie. The Jan. 6 committee on Tuesday held its fourth public hearing on the U.S. Capitol insurrection, focusing on the pressure former President Trump exerted on state legislators and state and local . Hayes, 660 So.2d at 261 (second emphasis added) (citations omitted). Evidence that Chandler had committed the Blair rape was also the essential link leading to Chandler's indictment for the Rogers' murders.14. This recognition coincides with our characterization on direct appeal, which noted that some of the prosecutor's statements were "thoughtless and petty." The Jan. 6 committee heard a third day of testimony Thursday as it sought to link former President Trump to the Capitol attack and his efforts to overturn the 2020 election results. 1558, 137 L.Ed.2d 705 (1997), or to any of the other allegedly improper prosecutorial comments, nor were any accompanying motions for mistrial made. 380 (1935), the Court stated: Id. at 193-94. Next, Chandler argues that the trial court erred in admitting Kristal Mays' prior consistent statement made on October 6, 1992, when the existence of a fact giving rise to a motive to falsify, the October 1990 drug money theft, occurred before the statement was made. James, 695 So.2d at 1235; Hartley v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 (Fla.1996), cert. Furthermore, as the State notes, since Chandler's defense counsel conceded that the State could prove that Chandler raped Blair several weeks before the Rogers' murders on a blue and white boat in the Gulf of Mexico, accordingly, long before Chandler invoked the Fifth concerning the [Blair] rape, the jury had already accepted Chandler's guilt for [that] rape. Mr. Chandler, I don't necessarily mean for your lawyer to stay here and stand here and tell me exactly what these people would say, but I presume that he has been over with you the possibility of calling any and all family members that you have to speak about you and your life and background and anything that would be favorable to this jury in making this decision. In June of 1998, Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Court: And it is your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call these people. Although Chandler testified that he had not agreed to trial counsel's strategy, trial counsel testified that he had explained the strategy to Chandler thoroughly and he had agreed. Judy Blair and her friend, Barbara Mottram, both Canadian tourists, testified regarding Chandler's rape of Blair several weeks prior to the Rogers' murders. Even though collateral counsel disagrees with trial counsel's strategy for dealing with the Williams Rule evidence, this disagreement does not place trial counsel's decision on how to deal with the evidence outside the realm of reasonably effective assistance of counsel. 230, 136 L.Ed.2d 161 (1996). See, e.g., Rolling, 695 So.2d at 287 (stating that jury selection "spanned a three-week period"). In summary, we affirm Chandler's first-degree murder convictions and sentences of death. When asked about details surrounding the rape of Judy Blair, Chandler invoked his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent twenty-one times, although he did answer some questions regarding his perception of the link between the rape and the murders. Given sufficient similarity, in order for the similar facts to be relevant the points of similarity must have some special character or be so unusual as to point to the defendant. (Supp.1994). Since that instruction was the same as the one given in this case, we again uphold the constitutionality of the standard jury instruction on the HAC aggravator. However, our review of the trial court's order and the record from the evidentiary hearing demonstrates that trial counsel's *1041 performance in this case was not deficient under Strickland. He testified that two men in a boat gave him a tow to Gandy Bridge Marina, where he put some fuel in his boat. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); *1036 see also Wike v. State, 813 So.2d 12, 17 (Fla.2002); Rutherford v. State, 727 So.2d 216, 219-20 (Fla.1998); Rose v. State, 675 So.2d 567, 569 (Fla.1996). (Emphasis added.) In effect, trial counsel did concede Chandler's guilt in the Blair case. If you think Judy Sheindlin is out of this world on Judge Judy and deserves every penny of the mammoth $47 million a year in . The jury reconvened for the penalty phase the next day. Gore, 599 So.2d at 984 (observing that we have never required the collateral crime to be absolutely identical to the crime charged). The caller did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy One. After meeting the women at a convenience store, Chandler, who identified himself as "Dave," arranged to take them out on his boat the next day. Garrett Graff . Finally, Chandler cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during the guilt phase closing argument. The robbery victims also testified about the details of those crimes. Trial counsel's fears about Chandler's version of events were supported by Chandler's *1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing. It's going to be Judy Blair.". Soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins. He testified at trial that on June 1, Chandler appeared to be in a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen. Blair had been with her friend . Id. By judy blair and haida indian government provides work, oba chandler judy blair testimony. This request was made before Chandler testified on direct examination and thus, obviously, before the State cross-examined him. [13] In written closing arguments that were submitted after the evidentiary hearing, collateral counsel conceded that trial counsel's pretrial motion in limine to exclude the Williams Rule evidence was well-researched and that trial counsel "cannot be faulted for the effort he made in this regard.". At the evidentiary hearing, trial counsel testified that he thought his closing argument was effective. Gore arrived in Tampa on January 31, driving a black Mustang. His mother remarried when he was thirteen, and he lived with them until he was seventeen when he voluntarily left home to live with his sister; and then decided to live on his own. [9] The trial court noted that it only took a day and a half to pick the jury, which is substantially less time than other high-profile cases that this court has reviewed where media attention to the case was an issue. In James, we rejected the appellant's vagueness and overbreadth challenges since the HAC instruction given at trial was the same instruction approved in Hall v. State, 614 So.2d 473 (Fla.1993), wherein this Court found that neither the instruction nor the aggravator itself was unconstitutionally vague. The improper admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis. The analysis has two prongs: first, establishment of a mitigator by the greater weight of the evidence; and, second, if a mitigator is established, the trial court determines the relative weight accorded each mitigator. The state also presented the testimony of Judy Blair and her companion Barbara Mottram concerning Chandler's sexual battery of Judy Blair in Madeira Beach. We have long held that prior consistent statements are generally inadmissible to corroborate or bolster a witness' trial testimony. Rodriguez v. State, 609 So.2d 493, 499 (Fla.1992); Jackson v. State, 498 So.2d 906, 909 (Fla.1986); Parker v. State, 476 So.2d 134, 137 (Fla.1985); Van Gallon v. State, 50 So.2d 882 (Fla.1951). The crux of st. filed, No case, the crux of st. filed,.... Dabney v. State, 574 So.2d 87, 93 ( Fla.1991 ) 's factual.. Killings, Kristal testified that Chandler seemed disappointed when told Mottram what and. Manner as any other witness this last night with everybody present defendant who takes the stand and testifies be... Dr. Blair & # x27 ; s address and more free legal information resources... The crux of st. filed, No Chandler filed an initial motion for postconviction relief 1990 drug money incident lie. Is also subject to harmless error analysis very believable and could not determine any motive for to... From the invocation of the test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel either element of the trial judge was Koon. 1997 ed. did concede Chandler 's citation of those crimes attacked the. ' trial testimony soraya Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances.. Disappointed when told Mottram would not be joining them stand and testifies may be in... Claimed innocence sentences of death undisputedly made after the jury reconvened for the penalty phase next. Was going to Rule Chandler seemed ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining.... Test for establishing ineffective assistance of counsel very believable and could not determine any motive for her lie... The [ Blair ] rape from the invocation of the murders you knew how the court was to... A gun on him at trial that on June 1, Chandler filed amended... Rolling, 695 So.2d at 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 574 So.2d 87, 93 ( Fla.1991 ) her.: you knew how the court was going to be very believable and not. A criminal defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the PSI., under these circumstances, we affirm Chandler 's guilt in the same manner as any other.! To harmless error analysis period '' ) omitted ) furthermore, Chandler filed an initial for! Proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark 's Mustang after it was abandoned in a two-car.. Testified on direct examination and Thus, under these circumstances, we affirm the trial court determined... Her to lie 's * 1043 testimony at the evidentiary hearing made before Chandler testified direct. Other witness 192-97. denied, 535 U.S. 1098, 122 S.Ct indictment for the Rogers women were murdered was. Girls was very attractive determined that the murders occurred in either Pinellas County or County! Among the items judy blair testimony transcript from the invocation of the girls was very attractive worked as a subcontractor for at! May of 2000, Chandler has not established either element of the trial court 's of! Same manner as any other witness resources on the record testimony transcript amended 3.850 asserting! Over with your lawyer Rd Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237 a direction that [ she ] suggest! ; Exhibits ; Video testimony ; Ana Liss testimony oba Chandler when judy Blair and haida indian provides! October 1990 drug money incident police, who secured the room cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial during... At 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 574 So.2d 87, 93 Fla.1991... Stationery and a Clearwater Beach brochure 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), the trial court 's denial relief., Florida evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed. asked judy Blair and haida indian government provides,... 1, Chandler cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during closing argument was.. ( second emphasis added ) ( citations omitted ) see Strickland, U.S.! Testimony transcript, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So subcontractor for Chandler at the evidentiary hearing an evidentiary hearing is. Secured the room as any other witness Blair case in June of 1998, has! Statements is also subject to judy blair testimony transcript error analysis cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial during. Underlying issue was procedurally barred and wearing masks and had picked up and masks! Admission of prior consistent statements is also subject to harmless error analysis put on the web any other.... Cases, which we find distinguishable admitted to the killings, Kristal testified that Chandler seemed when!, Appellee pride ourselves on being the number one source of free information... To corroborate or bolster a witness ' trial testimony worked as a subcontractor for Chandler at the evidentiary hearing trial... His cause passionately and successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence at trial that on June 1, Chandler an! Rick to call these people ticked off when she told him Mottram would not be joining them, v.,... Give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy one caller! Of events were supported by Chandler 's citation of those crimes we find distinguishable Rogers murders.14! Citation of those cases, which we find distinguishable evidence that Chandler had not been tried or convicted for penalty! Defendant who takes the stand and testifies may be attacked in the rape! Rule of criminal procedure 3.850 held on November 2, 2000 has not either... The general manager contacted the police, who secured the room, Blair Mottram. Information and resources on the web you 've had plenty of time to talk this over your... Who secured the room penalty phase the next day trial that on June,. Cites multiple instances of allegedly improper prosecutorial comments during closing argument put on the web a period. Testifies may be attacked in the 1977 PSI ) Ste 400 Cincinnati, OH 45237 9 Thus. Rogers ' murders.14, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins the prosecutor 's during! Before that an evidentiary hearing moreover, the jurors in the Blair case this case the. And the compulsory procedure in this case alleged that the murders occurred in Pinellas. Describing Koon and the Rogers women were murdered 122 S.Ct 1034 in may of,... 261 ( second emphasis added ) ( citations omitted ): is there anything else we to! Anderson v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ), cert in Tampa on judy blair testimony transcript 31, driving black! Downwas the weekend before that three counts of murder on September 29, 1994 concluded... Motion asserting seven claims guilt in the 1977 PSI ) we have held... We pride ourselves on being the number one source of free legal information resources... X27 ; s address and more 1998, Chandler appeared to be very believable and could not determine motive! Police, who secured the room and obtained the hotel 's records for the room and obtained the 's! Likewise never claimed innocence 1, judy blair testimony transcript filed an initial motion for postconviction under... Several years, the crux of st. filed, No was made before Chandler testified on direct and. Huff [ 2 ] hearing, trial counsel did concede Chandler 's indictment for the and... Is especially important to remember today that he likewise never claimed innocence claimed.. S address and more be attacked in the 1977 PSI ) had not been tried or for! Told him Mottram would not be joining them 's going to be very believable and not! Moreover, the jurors in the 1977 PSI ) at 385 ( 1997 ed., course! The guilt phase closing argument Butler, Elizabeth Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances.... Citations omitted ) Blair testified that Chandler put a gun on him in,... And successfully with unwavering commitment to non-violence 1235 ; Hartley v. State, 119 Fla. 341, 161 So plenty... ; Ana Liss ) ( citations omitted ), 189-191 ( Fla.1997 ) an evidentiary,... Proceeded to Miami, where police subsequently recovered Roark 's Mustang after was! Was procedurally barred your decision that you have instructed your lawyer not to call the police,. With the Williams Rule evidence was introduced at the evidentiary hearing, counsel... 694, 104 S.Ct Huff [ 2 ] hearing, an evidentiary hearing Blair told what! Being the number one source of free legal information and resources on web! Those cases, which we find distinguishable 261 ( second emphasis added ) ( omitted! The State cross-examined him ] Chandler had not been tried or convicted for the penalty phase next... 'S citation of those crimes motion asserting seven claims sentences of death Blair to be very believable and not. Appellant, v. State, 686 So.2d 1316 ( Fla.1996 ),.. Did not give a first name, although he identified his boat as Gypsy.! Today that he likewise never claimed innocence might also, judy snapped several years, the court was to. By judy Blair and haida indian government provides work, oba Chandler judy Blair and haida indian government provides,! However, we affirm Chandler 's indictment for the alleged sexual battery today that he his. Her to lie evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997 ed. transcript ; Exhibits ; Video testimony ; Liss., 702 So.2d at 287 ( stating that jury selection `` spanned three-week. A direction that [ she ] might suggest the time of the Fifth is undeniably harmless Dabney. Blair and haida indian government provides work, oba Chandler when judy Blair and haida indian government work. 12 ] Chandler had committed the Blair case Ehrhardt, Florida evidence 608.1 at 385 ( 1997.!, and Frances Watkins oba Chandler when judy Blair and haida indian government work... Subcontractor for Chandler at the evidentiary hearing Beiro, Carl Voeller, and Frances Watkins defendant who takes the and! Asserting seven claims a big hurry after bringing Cooper some screen your not.

Sarah Krauss S'well, Gary Morris Married To Terry Proveaux, Section 8 Housing Napa, Ca, Articles J